6 min read

Financial Crime: Types, Examples, and Penalties

Isabella JovenDirector of Case Management

May 12, 2024

Financial Crime: Types, Examples, and Penalties

Major Categories of Financial Crime Selected Penalties Civil Consequences Common Internal Fraud Schemes Red Flags and Detection Indicators Industry-Specific Exposure Responding to Suspected Financial Crime

Major Categories of Financial Crime

Fraud. The broadest category, covering deception for financial gain. Subcategories include wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, healthcare fraud, investment fraud, insurance fraud, and mortgage fraud. Federal fraud statutes, especially the wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C. 1343), are drafted broadly. They can apply to almost any scheme involving deceptive conduct and electronic communications.

Embezzlement. Misappropriation of funds or property entrusted to an employee or fiduciary. It differs from theft by the element of entrustment: the embezzler had lawful access to the property and converted it to personal use.

Money laundering. Processing criminal proceeds to make them appear to come from a legitimate source. Money laundering charges (18 U.S.C. 1956 and 1957) accompany nearly every significant federal financial crime prosecution. Proceeds of the underlying offense are almost always involved in later transactions.

Securities fraud. Deceptive practices in connection with securities transactions. Insider trading, Ponzi schemes, broker misconduct, and financial statement fraud affecting investors in publicly traded securities are all prosecuted under securities fraud statutes administered by the SEC and the Department of Justice.

Tax crimes. Tax evasion, filing false returns, failure to file, and employment tax fraud are criminal offenses. They are prosecuted by the IRS Criminal Investigation division and the Department of Justice Tax Division.

Bribery and corruption. Bribing domestic officials and foreign officials (under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), commercial bribery, and kickback arrangements are criminally prosecuted. They can also support civil RICO claims.

Identity theft and account fraud. Using another person's identity to get financial benefits, open credit accounts, or access funds. This includes both individual identity theft and corporate identity fraud.

Selected Penalties

Wire fraud (18 U.S.C. 1343): Up to 20 years per count; up to 30 years if financial institutions are involved.

Bank fraud (18 U.S.C. 1344): Up to 30 years per count, plus fines up to $1 million per count.

Money laundering (18 U.S.C. 1956): Up to 20 years per count and the greater of $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved.

Securities fraud (15 U.S.C. 78j and related statutes): Up to 20 years per count for individuals under Sarbanes-Oxley; significantly higher under some provisions.

FCPA violations: Criminal penalties up to $2 million per violation for organizations. Civil penalties in DOJ and SEC enforcement actions can reach hundreds of millions of dollars in significant cases.

Sentences in financial crime cases are cumulative. A defendant convicted on multiple counts of wire fraud, money laundering, and securities fraud may face decades in prison from sentences that run consecutively.

Civil Consequences

Criminal prosecution is not the only consequence of financial crime. Civil litigation by victims can produce judgments for actual damages, disgorgement of profits, and in some cases punitive damages. Civil RICO claims, which allow treble damages, are available when the criminal conduct is patterned. Regulatory enforcement can produce disgorgement, civil penalties, and bars from serving as officers or directors. For financial professionals, it can also produce bars from the industry.

Common Internal Fraud Schemes

Most financial crime inside organizations falls into recognizable patterns that investigators see repeatedly across industries. Billing schemes involve a trusted employee, often in accounts payable, creating fictitious vendors or submitting inflated invoices from legitimate vendors with whom the employee has a kickback arrangement. Payroll schemes include ghost employees, falsified hours, and unauthorized bonuses or commission adjustments. Check tampering, now often executed through ACH and wire manipulation rather than physical checks, involves altering payee information or redirecting legitimate payments to attacker-controlled accounts.

Expense reimbursement fraud is often modest in individual transactions, but it can aggregate into significant losses over years. It frequently signals broader integrity issues when identified. Cash larceny and skimming remain common in retail, hospitality, and healthcare settings where point-of-sale controls are weak. Financial statement manipulation is typically committed by senior finance personnel with authority over journal entries and reserves. It is the rarest but most damaging category because it distorts the organization's reported position and can trigger securities liability on top of the underlying loss.

Many of these schemes persist for years before detection because the perpetrator is a trusted employee with tenure, access, and the ability to reconcile their own work. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners consistently reports median scheme durations of twelve to eighteen months, with much longer duration for schemes by owners and executives. Our CFE-credentialed forensic accountants work cases where early indicators have already surfaced and leadership needs a rigorous, defensible investigation. Those indicators include anomalies in vendor master files, unusual journal entries, and patterns in employee access logs.

Red Flags and Detection Indicators

Behavioral and transactional red flags often appear before formal detection. On the behavioral side, investigators look for employees who:

refuse to take vacation
resist cross-training
maintain unusual control over vendor relationships
display lifestyle changes inconsistent with known compensation

Unexplained close relationships between procurement personnel and specific vendors, resistance to audit inquiries, and hostility toward new controls or personnel are recurring indicators in retrospective case reviews.

Transactional red flags include:

round-dollar invoices
sequential invoice numbers from a single vendor over extended periods
addresses that match employee residences
vendors with no web presence or verifiable business operations
payment patterns that consistently fall just below approval thresholds

In financial statement fraud, analysts watch for earnings that consistently meet guidance by narrow margins, unusual growth in receivables relative to revenue, declining cash flow from operations alongside rising reported earnings, and frequent changes in accounting estimates or reserves.

Technology-enabled detection has improved dramatically, but skilled insiders adapt. Forensic data analysis of the general ledger, vendor master file, and payroll system remains essential in any serious internal investigation. It is often paired with email review and endpoint analysis handled by our digital forensics team. The integration of accounting analysis with digital evidence collection is what separates a defensible investigative work product from an informal internal inquiry that cannot withstand litigation or regulatory scrutiny.

Industry-Specific Exposure

Financial crime risk varies significantly by industry, and effective controls must be calibrated to the specific exposures an organization faces. Healthcare organizations contend with billing fraud against government payors, kickback arrangements involving referrals, and pharmaceutical diversion. All carry False Claims Act exposure with treble damages and per-claim penalties. Construction and government contracting face bid rigging, change order manipulation, certified payroll falsification, and Davis-Bacon violations. Financial services firms carry exposure to insider trading, market manipulation, customer fund misappropriation, and anti-money-laundering program failures that can produce enforcement actions on their own, without any underlying predicate offense.

Technology companies increasingly face revenue recognition issues, channel stuffing, and disclosure fraud surrounding product readiness or customer metrics. Private equity and venture-backed companies face specific pressure during fundraising and exit events that historically correlates with financial reporting manipulation. Cross-border operations multiply exposure under the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act, and parallel statutes in other jurisdictions. They also introduce sanctions and export control risks that frequently intersect with financial crime investigations. Boards and audit committees responding to any of these scenarios typically engage outside investigators to preserve independence and attorney work product. Our executive misconduct investigation team handles matters where the subject is a senior officer and internal channels cannot credibly lead the inquiry.

Responding to Suspected Financial Crime

The first 72 hours after credible suspicion arises matter disproportionately. Evidence preservation should happen before any subject is interviewed or placed on notice. This includes forensic imaging of relevant devices and preservation notices to cloud providers and email hosts. Access reviews, segregation of duties adjustments, and temporary administrative measures should be handled with legal counsel. That avoids wrongful termination exposure and preserves the option of criminal referral. Communications about the matter should be channeled through counsel to protect privilege.

Parallel tracks typically develop in any significant matter:

an internal investigation led by counsel
potential insurance claims under fidelity or crime policies
potential civil recovery against the perpetrator and any third-party facilitators
potential regulatory reporting obligations depending on industry and the nature of the conduct
potential criminal referral

Each track has its own evidentiary standards, timing considerations, and strategic tradeoffs. A fidelity insurer, for example, will require documentation that differs in form from what a prosecutor needs. Premature public disclosure can compromise recovery in any of these channels.

Vendor and counterparty due diligence done before a relationship begins is much less expensive than investigation after a loss has occurred. Our due diligence services support acquisitions, major contracts, executive hires, and investment decisions where the cost of incomplete information exposes the organization to fraud risk. For ongoing counterparty monitoring and competitive intelligence needs, corporate clients engage us for structured, recurring review programs.

Our corporate investigation team and CFE-credentialed forensic accountants investigate financial crime for organizations, boards, and legal counsel. Corporate clients retain us directly for internal response, SAR-adjacent documentation, and civil recovery planning. Contact us for a confidential consultation.